A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours about the development of the wall at a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental issues, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments report about René Collier and also the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed into a hugely publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, find to develop their spouse and children residence. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of established inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore spots are subject to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, significantly within a sensitive coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the right posture. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to protect their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, wherever views of The ocean are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic endeavours through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-large h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, an image which has because develop into emblematic from the intensity on the dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Collect Visible evidence on the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the water through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the website became The most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail by the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on whether interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute in the lawful timeline.
In the Main of the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as created, goes beyond what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been described as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and disorders attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is determined by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting as a substitute that it's about making certain that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing connection to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few basically attempting to create a Accountant Paul Feely family members home in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Location of Conservation and say that all is effective are performed based upon Expert assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description to get a scenario that numerous observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is now more contentious.
The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier observed the businessman experienced previously been associated with local advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from very different Qualified backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded via waist-high water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical actuality of the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal strategy.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome stays unsure. The court will have to determine whether or not the wall as designed complies with preparing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Particular Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and scheduling conditions. But the human aspect stays central: neighbours who will have to live together with each other prolonged once the legal fees have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building operates at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the situation increase past that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition it underscores how promptly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary difficulties for instance environmental safety and property rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. Whether or not it will finally be altered, removed, or completed as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will possible go on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent years.